<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://lions.teledyn.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title> - Coping with the SSSCA - Comments</title>
 <link>http://lions.teledyn.com/node/596</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Coping with the SSSCA&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Coping with the SSSCA</title>
 <link>http://lions.teledyn.com/node/596</link>
 <description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span class=regtextthin&gt;
	&lt;!--byline--&gt;Contributed by Gary Lawrence Murphy&lt;br&gt;osOpinion.com&lt;!--/byline--&gt;
	&lt;br&gt;
	&lt;!--date--&gt;March 20, 2002&lt;!--/date--&gt;

	&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt;
	 
	&lt;p&gt;
	
	&lt;!--body--&gt;It seems we&#039;re not even out of the woods on the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act), 
but post-Napster paranoia already is rearing its head over another gem: The Security 
Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA).
&lt;p&gt;
For those who are not entirely up to date regarding this matter, let me quote from Fritz 
Hollings&#039; masterwork:
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;It is unlawful to manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise 
traffic in any interactive digital device that does not include and utilize certified 
security technologies.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If you&#039;re not among those wondering whether it&#039;s time to stage a sit-in or start burning 
your smartcards on the steps of Congress, you might as well click on through now. For 
those who fear the worst, keep reading.</description>
 <comments>http://lions.teledyn.com/node/596#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:17:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>garym</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">596 at http://lions.teledyn.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
